social networking

We're going to play a new game...

After reading a couple of blog posts on a comment system called Disqus, I want to give it another shot.

I tried Disqus back in the day, and it was really slow and generally fairly annoying. Most of their issues seem to be resolved, and they've picked up a lot of steam in the meantime. So now I'm considering swapping out my current comments for something a little more hip and magickal. But I'd like your feedback on the issue. So here's what you've gotta do:

  1. Leave a comment below.
  2. Let me know how you feel about the experience.
  3. That's it!

You'll notice that there are several ways to identify yourself. If you have a Disqus, Facebook, or Twitter account you can use one of those. Feel free to try out a couple of accounts, or choose none at all. You can also link to this post on just about any social media site (FriendFeed or Twitter or Reddit or YouTube, for example) and it should pull in those comments as well.

So I'm curious what you think about it.

How is the experience? Do you like it better than a traditional blog comment system? Can you see yourself actually voting on other comments à la Slashdot/Reddit/Digg?

Have you used Disqus (or Intense Debate, or another similar service) in the past? Was there anything about it that you couldn't stand?

Most importantly, will this make you more or less likely to join the conversation?

We don't need to make a decision right away. We can play with Disqus for a while and see how we feel. If it's horrid, the old comment system is just a pref setting away.

So talk to me :)

Note: This is the first post on my blog (and currently the only one) with Disqus comments enabled. All older posts still use the native comment system. So you've gotta try Disqus out on this post. Thanks!

It bears repeating

A handful of questions about Twitter

when is too much too much?

That's the beauty of Twitter. You choose your own level of involvement.

if I don't respond to follow them does that mean that they know I'm not interested in them? why are they following me?

People new to Twitter, people who are unfamiliar with the follow/friend paradigm, and people who think it's a popularity contest will be bugged if you don't follow back. But that's because those three groups don't understand the power of a one-sided friendship.

On Facebook, you have to be friends (bi-directional) with someone to interact with them. Both of you have to agree on the status of your relationship.

But Twitter isn't about who is listening to you, or who is a bi-directional friend. Twitter is about who you interact with. For example, I am not following about a third of the people I interact with (reply to, talk about, etc). A good chunk of them aren't following me either. Because on Twitter, everything is open, and you don't have to have a defined relationship with someone to interact.

If someone responds to you, it'll show up under "@ replies" and you can carry on a conversation. But just because you're talking with them doesn't mean you have to listen to everything they say.

if they are following me are they listening or are they just waiting for me to follow them?

A little of both. Some people actually care, and some just want you to follow in return. Some are robots, some are spammers, and some are real people, who are really interested in what you have to say.

But regardless of the type of user, you should feel no obligation to follow back. I use a couple of tools to make this process easier.

Twimailer sends me really great "follow" notifications, so I can usually decide right in the email whether I want to follow back or ignore.

TweetSum calculates your recent followers' DBI ... It's a bit like a Google PageRank for Twitter users. It's based on their likelihood to follow you, to interact with you, and not send spammy tweets. It has a simple interface for sorting through the masses of followers and deciding who is worth following back.

at what point will i have to separate my friends from commerce, brands, I like, don't like, don't know.

I still haven't. I unfollow brands and companies that annoy me, but I don't worry too much about mixing them in with the stream. If you really need the separation, check out Nambu (Mac only) or TweetDeck (really awful interaction). They both allow you to group the people you follow, so you can interact with them as discrete streams. I tried that approach for a while, but it didn't suit me, so I'm back to one big river of messages.

how many is the right number of people to listen to, follow.

That depends.

I follow anyone who interests me at the time. If you make me laugh, or you start a conversation with me, or I interact with you in some other space--Facebook, IRL, mailing lists, etc--I might start following you. But to me, following is a fluid concept... If I tire of you, I might unfollow. If you tweet too much, I might unfollow you. If you set up automatic tweeting of all your Last.fm activity, there's a good chance I'll unfollow you.

But following isn't the only way I interact with people on Twitter. I track quite a few things that I'm interested in, and converse with people who talk about them. I listen to--and usually engage--everyone who talks to or about me, regardless of our respective follow status.

at what point does it get too hard to do?

When you think about it too much :)

This was originally a response to a post on a Meetup group I attend. It's a bit rough, but I feel like there's some value in it, so here ya go :)

SearchWiki - Google's customized social search is back

Google's messing with search engine results again, but this time it looks like they're trying to take on Wikipedia, not Digg. At least they're calling their editable search engine result experiment SearchWiki this time around. It still looks a lot like it did last time I reported on it (here and here). Check out a bunch of screenshots from this iteration here:

justin hileman - Google edited search results swm=2 Google SearchWiki Google SearchWiki - Add a search result Google SearchWiki - My SearchWiki notes Google SearchWiki - See all notes Google SearchWiki - Public comment form

Things are a bit smoother this time. Moving results is a nice, polished animation. Overall, SearchWiki pretty rad. I can't wait for more community features to show up. Mebbe they'll even use these Google public profiles we all have but don't know about?

If you wanna give it a shot but don't see the fun little grey buttons next to your search results, try adding &swm=2 to the end of a Google search URL. (swm=2 was the same parameter they used in the last iteration. YMMV). If that doesn't work, try 0 or 1 or 2. Can't hurt, right? :)

More on Google's "Digg-like" social search

I've been using Google's "Edit Search Results" since I blogged about it yesterday, and I have a couple further observations.

Read about Google's social search experiment after the jump.

brightkite fails

Brightkite fails miserably at the one thing they should do best. Twitter and Pownce already do a better job as a microblog or a stream of consciousness publishing platform. Brightkite is, or should be, a platform for facilitating real life interaction. But how well does it work?

I went to lunch today with @rachijan, and tried to update my Brightkite location while I was there. Here's the transcript of my conversation with the Brightkite robot:

Me:
?goodwood barbecue company Orem ut

Brightkite:
Sorry, but we couldn't find that business in Orem. Make sure you spelled it correctly and are in the correct city, or check in at its address.